Biographies
Echo Davidson is a PhD student in musicology at the University of Pittsburgh. Their research focuses on voice, performance, and media at the intersection of queer and trans theory, disability studies, and sound studies. Echo’s current work examines how vocal distortion, theatrical excess, and digital aesthetics operate as forms of resistance, ambiguity, and desire in contemporary music and opera. Their broader interests include opera remediation, trans vocality, and the politics of musical materiality. Echo has presented at meetings of the American Musicological Society, the Scriabin Society of America, and Iowa Musicology Day. They are also active in graduate student organizing and pedagogy initiatives, and committed to fostering accessible and inclusive spaces for performance and scholarship.
Résumé
Vana’s 2021 track Harlequin stages a sonic masquerade, reviving the commedia dell’arte archetype as a genderfluid figure of vocal disfigurement, affective ambiguity, and digital self-fashioning. Through pitch distortion, vocal fragmentation, and looping refrains, Harlequin performs a sonic clowning that unsettles the boundary between expression and artifice. This presentation weaves together musical analysis and audiovisual performance, echoing the fractured voice of the clown it explores. Emerging in the wake of a pandemic-era explosion of DIY aesthetics, digital drag, and trans vocal experimentation, Harlequin channels the clown as an emblem of survival in the face of legibility fatigue, genre exhaustion, and the weaponization of visibility. The Harlequin figure has long been associated with ambiguity racialized, sexualized, and gendered (Bakhtin 1984; Storey 2003). Drawing on Nina Sun Eidsheim’s concept of the “sonic mask” (2019), I analyze Vana’s vocal production as a kind of disidentificatory drag (Muñoz 1999), enacting an audible refusal of normative intelligibility. The song’s layered vocal effects, including autotune, pitch-shift, and breathy vocal fry, create a destabilized sonic body that slips between registers, genders, and expressive modes. Carolyn Abbate’s idea of voice as “ventriloquized” (2001) is central here: Harlequin is always both speaking and spoken-through, always already mediated.
Vana’s clown is also situated in a digital performance ecology that evokes what Legacy Russell calls Glitch Feminism (2020): a tactical error, a deliberate misperformance of identity that resists binary legibility. The clown, like the glitch, is productive in its failure. Where conventional vocal performance might strive for clarity, power, or authenticity, Vana opts for errancy, noise, and breakdown, refusing the listener’s desire for emotional resolution or stable identity.
In an era of intensified platform surveillance, culture war backlash, and the commodification of queerness, Harlequin makes a case for ambiguity as both a political and erotic tactic. Its distortions do not only obscure. They seduce. Through teasing vocal timbres and defiant sensuality, Vana’s performance queers the desire for coherence, offering instead what José Esteban Muñoz calls a “queer utopian impulse," a longing encrypted in performance, not confession. Framed through performance studies, queer sound studies, and trans aesthetic theory, this project considers Harlequin as an experiment in what Fred Moten calls “nonperformance” (2003), a way of inhabiting form without reproducing its violence. In doing so, Vana joins a lineage of artists who clown not to entertain but to fracture, to flirt, to survive.